Monday, Oct 03rd

Last update:08:21:32 PM GMT

You are here: Christian Doctrine Heresy and Error Insidious Arminianism in Local Churches: -Some everyday examples of this heresy

Insidious Arminianism in Local Churches: -Some everyday examples of this heresy

E-mail Print PDF

Do you recognise Arminianism when you see it? (No, it's not a trick question designed to catch you out). Perhaps you have heard the word before. Maybe a preacher has used it, or you've read the word in a Christian magazine. But, as so often happens, the word holds no real meaning or significance for people, simply because the one using it does not bother to explain what it means! It then gets pushed into the 'too-technical-for-me' category and forgotten. What usually happens then, is that whenever the word reappears, there is a knowing nod, as if to say "Yes, I know what it means", but it remains a mystery. This is a pity, for Arminianism (like all the other heresies and errors of the past) is alive and kicking, somewhere in England... and the USA... and China... and Africa... really, anywhere that the Gospel is preached.

Arminianism arose in the late 14th/early 15th century, but it is very close to a much earlier idea - that of 'Semi-Pelagianism'. And both are heresies. A Dutch reformed theologian, Jacobus Arminius, prompted by Rome, studied the book of Romans and decided that he could not accept its teaching on predestination, despite the fact that it is clearly stated in scripture. Predestination is often called a 'Calvinistic doctrine', because Calvin highlighted the teaching as part of his more general work on God's grace in salvation. But it is not Calvin's doctrine: it is God's! It is clearly found in scripture.

Arminius' denial of predestination brought him into conflict with other leading theologians. Yet, in 1610, his 'Remonstrance' (a statement of his teaching on the subject) was published. Followers of his teaching were called Remonstrants and they were condemned at the Synod of Dort (1618-19). In his Remonstrance, Arminius argued against five major teachings found in Calvinistic thought. Whilst Calvinism is still a major force within the churches, it can be said that Arminianism (seen by Calvinists to be the exact opposite of Calvinism) is of far greater influence today. Indeed, it is rapidly gaining ground, especially with the growing support for ecumenism throughout the world. The cult of Romanism is one of the most ardent of Arminian-type religions, though not based on it. Because of Arminianism's insidious (and not so hidden) growth, it is a wise man who examines what the implications are for Christians today.

Rather than enter into complicated theological debate, let us stay with ordinary examples of what Arminianism can mean for us today...

If you hear a preacher call someone to the front of the hall as a matter of course, to "make a decision for Christ", you may smile and pray that many will do so. This is because you genuinely want to see converts made. Nothing wrong with that. But, the very call made by the preacher - commonly made, I may add, right across the whole spectrum of Christianity (I used to do it myself!) - is itself heretical. This is because no man or woman or child can 'decide' to come to Christ! It does not matter how good the preaching is; if the Holy Spirit does not call a person, then he or she will remain dead in sin and no amount of pleading, on knees or otherwise, will change that stark fact. Hard to accept? To many, yes... as it was to Arminius. To say a person can choose his own salvation is a direct contradiction of Calvin's theology. More correctly, it is a direct contradiction of God's word. (That it does not agree with Calvin is of secondary importance).

A similar expression to 'deciding for Christ' is the currently fashionable one of "loving" someone "into the Kingdom". Really, it is the same error: to think that great prayers or, human persuasion, can change God's mind, or a person's soul. It suggests that if we pray 'hard enough' and 'long enough' or, argue well, that God will do what He may not otherwise have done. It also suggests that our prayers can somehow 'make' a person 'come to Christ'. Linked with this erroneous view is the idea that anyone who is seen to be a 'bad witness' (someone who does not fit the idea of a Believer in the eyes of the praying person) can somehow undo the benefits of ardent prayers! The heresy is that such ideas claim to alter God's eternal design and will. God saves from eternity, not at the whim, or even the real urgency, of a Believer!

So, those big campaigns that centre on our own activities, on making sermons 'more interesting', on 'bringing them in', etc., are, really, modern evidences of Arminianism, which is heresy. It directly challenges God's own Will. It denies salvation by Grace alone. In this light it is irrelevant that such thinking is anti-Calvin, though we ought to be thankful for Calvin's forceful teaching on the matter. More pertinently, we should thank God that He chose to exercise Calvin to think the way he did and at the time he did. (To pre-empt critics: no, none of this excludes preaching the Gospel, or witnessing!).

Perhaps preachers do not realise that their calls and some activities are errors. That is beside the point. They are erroneous and that's that! The important thing now is that those who realise their error must stop it. Immediately. To know one is in error is a shock. It can also be 'embarrassing' in the human sense. The true Believer, however, will not allow that to stop him from changing his own words and teachings, if they are wrong. It is important for its own sake - that it is against God's word. It is also important because those 'saved' under Arminian preaching and calls may not be saved at all, but are deluded into thinking they are (note the high number of campaign 'failures'!). If these folk later 'decide' to 'train' for pastoral duties, then the folly is magnified many times over and the heresy spreads insidiously, deluding greater numbers than ever before.

Arminianism sits well on the shoulders of Romanistic-type thinkers. In Romanism the heresy is assimilated naturally. Pseudo-Christian cults like JWism and Mormon and others, are also Arminian by nature. Think carefully about the words you use. If you are a preacher, then your words are weighed by a jealous God, Whose way of salvation is determined and fixed. (Note: 'Predestination' is not necessarily the same as 'foreknowledge'). Those who have been saved, who are being saved and who will ever be saved, had their salvation decided before the world began. Their salvation was assured before they were, or will be, born. Just as salvation and its recipients are known and determined by God before time began, so is their perseverance... they can never, ever lose their salvation. Yet, Arminianism tells us that a man may lose his salvation! Again, this opposes scripture. Don't listen to error, under whatever name. Only God is true. As W.E.Best says in 'Regeneration and Conversion' 9I agree with him on this point, but not necessarily in others):

"The religious world is staggering under the influence of a depraved intellectualism which denies God His right to operate among the peoples of the world as He pleases. No-one can believe in free will and free grace at the same time. These subjects are as diametrically opposed as light and darkness, heaven and hell, or a holy God and an unholy man. To believe in free will dethrones the sovereign God; to believe in free grace dethrones depraved man. Who is on the throne in your concept of salvation?"

There are some who insinuate 'free will' for those who are saved, but I believe 'free will' is the wrong term to use for Believers. However, this Outline is not primarily a statement on free will, although the notion of free will is at the bottom of it all. (See other literature on that subject). To sum up: We cannot 'choose' salvation or God; we cannot 'search' for Him (unless He first draws us - a process which will always result in salvation); we cannot lose our salvation: once saved always saved. Anything else is to deny God His rule, His Holy power, and the authority of His unchanging and unchangeable word. Arminianism denies all this: it is therefore heresy. Sadly, charismatic churches are Arminian in character, beliefs and preaching. As such churches are growing world-wide, the churches are ripe for delusion and gross error*.

(* 1995 note: This came to pass in 1994, when the Toronto Blessing enveloped the entire world!)

 © April 1993

Published on

Bible Theology Ministries - PO Box 415, Swansea, SA5 8YH
United Kingdom