Wednesday, Dec 07th

Last update:03:33:51 PM GMT

You are here: In the News Arts and Media

Arts and Media

BBC’s Strategic 470% Positive Discrimination in Favour of Homosexuals

E-mail Print PDF

Can the BBC please explain why when the Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimated “In 2015, 1.7% of the UK population identified themselves as lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB)”, the BBC wants to target LGBT (homosexuals) ‘On Air-Portrayal Targets’ and ‘Workforce Targets’ of 8%?

How does this 470% positive discrimination in favour of homosexuals, reflect balanced programming and recruitment?

"Answers on a ‘postcard’...."

Equality and diversity is BBC speak for a blatantly biased, discriminatory, illegal, on-air and recruitment policies and targets that the British Licence fee payer is forced to embrace and swallow. Stop your social liberalism now!

BBC Propose Broadcasting Muslim ‘Call to Prayer’ on a Friday

E-mail Print PDF

It is widely reported that the BBC are considering whether to broadcast the Muslim Call to prayer and to reduce its Christian 'bias' in programming. (Telegraph, May 2016)

How can the BBC even justify calling Islam a religion when its core scriptures are completely intolerant of infidels or kafirs (Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims) and its teachings promise its follows a passport to paradise for slaying them? How does that fit with the BBC’s Diversity and Inclusion Strategy 2016?

Islam is not a religion it is a political ideology that rejects Judaeo-Christian values and freedom of conscience and speech. The BBC dares not offend a Muslim in its news reporting by self-censoring images and words, but will delight in portraying Christians as bigoted fools and cultural numpties for opposing homosexuality and same-sex marriage. Yet, every human is born of a man and a woman - a very inconvenient fact!

What will the British people think when the BBC starts broadcasting the Muslim’s war cry “Allahu Akbar” (Allah is the greatest) and “La ilaha illa-Allah” (There is no god but Allah) every Friday at a call to prayer? You might as well let ISIS have a free pass to take over the BBC network. If you start allowing a call to prayer on a Friday, do you think it will stop at one day and only once a day?

Stop trying to sanitise the idolatrous and abominable pseudo-religion of Islam and stop forcing the British people to embrace and swallow its oppressive and destructive pus and vomit. Islam has no place in the civilised world let alone the UK.

Get real and use your journalistic training to be objective and portray Islam as it is and abort your politically correct social liberalism.

Sign the petition 'Protect Christian programming and coverage at the BBC'.

Hijab worn by presenter on Channel 4 mid-day news.

E-mail Print PDF

Tuesday 27 September 2016, the news presenter was wearing an hijab.

In view of the VERY serious consternation in the West about the insidious infiltration of the West by Islam, using ‘cultural’ weapons (burka, burkini, etc), was this choice of presenter genuine?

Was she chosen because she is superior to white, non-Muslims?

Or was it, as I suspect, a provocative pro-Islam move to bring Islam even closer to the people, by dominating the news?

I know what it was – a definite statement of pro-Islam. It is getting viewers used to seeing the signs of Islam. What comes next – BBC-style news favouring Palestinian terrorism and Islamic violence?

No offence to the presenter, but it begs serious questions.

It is noted that Ofcom has rejected complaints that it was inappropriate for Channel 4 News to allow a Muslim journalist to present coverage of the Nice truck attack (Guardian, 22 August 2016).

So a Muslim can murder and injure scores of tourists in a terror attack in Nice and then another Muslim report their 'success' on Channel 4 news.

Would a Nazi be allowed on Channel 4 News to report on the 'success' of the gas chambers in killing Jews at Auschwitz?

Be Divergent!

E-mail Print PDF

I don’t normally watch a secular film, but on this occasion... I just watched a film named ‘Divergent’ (rated ‘12’ and no foul language etc)  (2014). I bought it for £3 in a superstore (Tesco? Asda?) because of what I suspected was the concept... brainwashing by PC methods. (Please note I am not saying that the film 'Divergent' is in anyway edifying for a Christian. Watch at your own discretion.)

And I was right.

It made me shudder, because it contains strong elements of fascism – something I have fought against for years. In the film young people were persuaded by psychological pressure (which they did not realise was there) to conduct mass shootings of people not wanted in the walled city. Those who were considered ‘divergent’ were sought out and thrown outside the city walls and killed. The symbolism was accurate and heavy, reminding me of Nazi Germany and ISIS who brainwash people to do what they would not normally do, including murder (actual psychology trials confirm people are willing to do this). Basically, it shows what happens when a few individuals do not comply with the (fascist) rule and demands of a very few, just like today. It also displayed very strong PC commands by people in power. For me, the violence portrayed mimics Nazi rule.

Read more...

Titanosaurs – biggest ever? (BBC 1. 24 January 2016)

E-mail Print PDF

I rarely watch anything by David Attenborough, but for some reason watched this programme (BBC1 , 24th Jan.).

I'm glad I did, just to see the excavation of the biggest ever dinosaur 'Titanosaurs' (actually seven of them) thus far. It would not surprise me if someone in the future dug up something even bigger, such was God's design ability! It is 10% bigger than any other similar species, so they think it might be a new species.

I don't watch his programmes simply because his script is littered profusely with evolution, and, for me, that spoils the programme. It spoils it for me because when he utters a pro-evolution statement I immediately answer back – though he can't hear me!! When I know pro-evolution statements are unscientific and unprovable, it is a source of much annoyance when I can't shout "Hey! Let's argue that point!"

It showed that seven bodies of this dinosaur were found in one place. Also, nearby, some of their eggs.

Remarkably, baby dinosaur skin was found in an egg and Attenborough, perhaps inadvertently, said that the eggs were taken by a flood. He meant a localised flood – but the water pressure, he said at a later time, was not powerful enough to float such huge animal bodies to their final resting place!

Read more...

Page 1 of 4

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »