The legal contortions that legislators will have to make to accommodate or simply ignore to bring into law Same-Sex Marriage in the new Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) bill are just mind boggling.

‘Voice for Justice UK’ identifies some of them in their submission to Public Scrutiny of the new bill, such as:

• The legitimacy issue of children brought into same-sex relationships for woman-woman and men-men relationships – who is the legally responsible father?
• The confusion and distress amongst children when they hear that Same-Sex Marriage is ‘good’ at school and ‘bad’ at home, aggravated with peer pressure.
• The huge increase and financial burden to the NHS of free at point of delivery IVF treatment for Same-Sex people.
• The gagging of Christians and people of conscience in schools and work across all sectors that object to Same-Sex Marriage and have to comply with this new political correctness.
• Marriage will inevitably become meaningless if the criteria for marriage is “love and commitment” (David Cameron) to each other as it will naturally follow that all manner of relationships are acceptable e.g. brother and sister, father and daughter and plural marriages.

In 2007, when the treaty of Lisbon was being discussed in secret – by leaders and not the public - ECAS (the European Citizen Action Service, based in Brussels) asked for documents on the process concerning the UK's position on the 'EU Charter of Fundamental Rights'. This request was refused, even though it is 'legally' required by the EU... which proves the EU can do whatever it likes. The requests were continued and have only just been granted freedom of access (2013).

The request for open access was put in before discussions were held on the Lisbon Treaty. But, the EU did not wish to let the public know what was going on – they wanted secrecy to avoid public disquiet. When access was denied, the ECAS complained to the European Ombudsman, who wanted open access, in 2011. However, the EU again refused. So, in 2012 the Ombudsman said that the EU was guilty of a "serious instance of maladministration." (Really, the same charge could be made against the entire EU administration!).

18 February 2013

Mrs Helen Grant MP
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
2-4 Cockspur Street
London
SW1Y 5DH

Also submitted to Parliament Scrutiny Committee and published on Parliament UK website.

Dear Mrs Grant

Re: Equal Marriage

Thank you for your letter addressing the issues I raised (letter 18 December 2012) concerning Same-Sex Marriage to Mr Geraint Davies MP; he has forwarded a copy to me with a copy of the document “The Facts about Equal Marriage” (January 2013).

Your letter and document are still not addressing the core issues of Same-Sex Marriage and diverting the argument away on to irrelevancies. This tactic was also followed by MPs who supported Same-Sex Marriage in the debate in Parliament on 5 February 2013. The core issues are these:

1 There is No Mandate for Same-Sex Marriage. This was admitted openly in the debate, but it was dismissed as not being relevant and justified on grounds of ‘equality’ and ‘love’. It is however highly relevant. No political party or the government has a mandate from the public to introduce such a seismic change to society as we know it. So why is parliament ‘raping’ the public and the culture of society with this policy?

Yesterday's long debate in parliament (5 February 2013) on the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) bill, showed that the majority of MP's are willingly under the tyranny of the homosexual (Sodomite) lobby groups such as Stonewall and are totally sold out to promoting their ideology and their definition of equality.

The quality of the debate and the arguments put forward by the advocates for Same-Sex Marriage were pathetic. The words 'equality' and 'loving relationships' were repeated like a mantra, to somehow conceal the inconsistencies between true marriage between a man and a woman and the proposed parody of Same-Sex Marriage. Conveniently and repeatedly, also ignored was every single point raised that showed the bill would actually promote inequality and division in UK society and the imposition of an "Orwellian" fascist and tyrannical ideology on all citizens.

On Sunday 13 January 2013, there was a mass public protest in Paris France, by hundreds of thousands of people opposed to the proposed change in the law to permit Same Sex Marriage.

Like in the UK, the political elite are ignoring the views, and the petitions of the majority of people who are opposed to Same Sex Marriage. (BBC, 13 January 2013).

Will the silent majority of the people in the UK, stand up and protest against the perverse policy proposals of the government before it is too late?

The details of the UK government’s proposals for the pathetic parody of Same Sex Marriage show how forced the legislation will be and the monstrous changes that will be made to the definitions of key words of the English language relating to: Husband, Wife, Mother, Father, Sex, Marriage, Consummation, Adultery, Male, Female, Spouse, Widow, Widower, Mum, Dad, Grandma, Grandpa, etc; are detailed in the recently updated parliamentary document ‘Same Sex Marriage and Civil Partnerships’ (Catherine Fairbairn, 18 December 2012)

1 Same Sex Couples will have to refer to themselves as "husband and husband" or "wife and wife" in administration processes and in the contracting process or exchange of vows:

Your ref: GB/WADD01001/01/01121230

Geraint Davies MP Swansea West (Labour)

Dear Mr Davies

Re: Letter 18 December 2012 Same Sex Marriage

Thank you for your detailed reply and making clear to me your support for Same Sex Marriage.

As you know the government's consultation on Same Sex Marriage, which I responded to, was a farce in its structure and questioning as it only related to the implementation of the government's proposals and not on whether they were valid in the first place - that is not a consultation!

The government's report on the consultation has not changed anything; accept to show they are in the pocket of Stonewall and other GLBTQ lobby groups. How many ministers and MP's have been threatened with an 'outing' if they don't support Same Sex Marriage? Nothing else explains the irrational determination to introduce such a perverse policy that will have such a major impact on society.

None of the main political parties had the guts to put Same Sex Marriage in their manifesto at the last election, and yet they are charging through with a policy of 'let's do it quick before the public realise we have no mandate.'[i]

I have been asked about Obama's fraudulent re-election. Some think I will be too angry to speak. Not so!

I hate the man's policies and godless agenda, not the man. The man I feel sorry for, because he is bound for hell.

As I said before the election, if Obama got back in there is very little more to say... we provided continuous information from before he was a candidate! We covered almost all of his antics and criminality.

I feel compassion for those genuine believers in the USA, who must now be shell-shocked by the news. On the other hand, Romney would not have been much better! Both candidates are godless.

I see this episode as a warning to real Christians to stand firm and to repent, to obey God and show the world what true Christians are.

"Forget gay marriage. In Russia and Ukraine, politicians are treating homosexuality like a curable addiction -- and even a crime.

Last week, acting on a widespread popular belief that sexual orientation is a matter of indoctrination, the Ukrainian parliament gave its preliminary approval to a bill that makes "propaganda of homosexuality" a criminal offense, punishable by a fine of about $10,000 or as many as five years in prison. "The spread of homosexuality is a threat to national security because it propagates the HIV/AIDS epidemic, destroys the family and could lead to a demographic crisis," the bill's drafters wrote in an explanatory note. The danger, they reasoned, is great enough to justify a limitation on freedom of speech." (Bloomberg, 10 October 2012)

The list given here of reasons to make homosexuality a criminal offense, is by no means exhaustive. Yet in the UK the politicians just don't want to know and the broadcast media promote the whole "born gay lie" and refuse to allow any criticism of the gay life style and exposure of the real health and other risks to children society and culture as we know it.

Ann Widecombe is a very rare politician who really spells out many of the full implications of Same Sex Marriage legislation being introduced into the UK. Well done Ann for telling it as it is.  Conservative Party Conference C4M Fringe Meeting Wednesday 10 October 2012.

6 October 2012

"Tory hierarchy are reluctant for grassroots to discuss the issue of Same Sex Marriage" says Anglican Mainstream

"Empty Chair debate goes ahead without them".

Top Westminster think-tank Policy Exchange (PE) has pulled out at short notice of a Tory conference fringe debate on gay marriage with Anglican Mainstream, the (PE) socially conservative 'information network' in the Church of England.

BTM Co-worker James Waddell proposes the following interesting angle on the notorious attempt to bring in Same Sex Marriage. I believe he makes a strong case. Will Christian advocates follow it up?

"In His report, the UN Secretary General, pursuant to Security Council Resolution 808, succinctly described this category of crimes as follows:

Crimes Against Humanity were first recognized in the Charter and judgement of the Nuremberg Tribunal as well as in Law No.10 of the control Council for Germany. Crimes against humanity are aimed at any civilian population and are prohibited regardless of whether they are committed in an armed conflict, international or internal in character. They "are particularly odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; extermination; torture; rape; political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion."

The duplicity of UK government ministers never ceases to amaze. Occasionally we get a glimpse of what is in the dark heart of a government minister and they reveal openly their complete contempt for the law and the citizens they are meant to represent.

Mr Andrew Mitchell's (Conservative Chief Whip) insulting and threatening words and behaviour against police officer following security policy on 19 September 2012, provides one example. Another is the UK government's across party fascist approach to enforce Same Sex Marriage on the British people.

In a letter written to Michael Gove MP, Minister for Education, by a constituent, the duplicity is further exposed on how the UK government want to use SSM as the platform to introduce covert plans to expose every child in the country to paedophilic propaganda on the National Curriculum.

BBC reports on 19 September 2012:

"Australian members of parliament have overwhelmingly rejected a bill that would have legalised gay marriages after days of heated debate.
The House of Representatives voted 98 to 42 against the bill, with one MP resigning a key post after making controversial comments against it.
Australia does not permit gay marriage, though some states allow civil unions."

(Also see Christian Voice 19 September 2012)

Will Cameron, Clegg and Miliband have the guts to stop their sycophantic behaviour to Stonewall and gay MP's and abandon thier plans to introduce Same-Sex-Marriage (SSM) with their agenda to force the acceptance and embrace of buggery by everyone including children in our schools?

MPs want all this because many have had homosexual experiences.

Clegg, has appologised once about tution fees, he and the other leaders need to admit they got it wrong about pushing forward the agenda for Same Sex Marriage and put homosexuality back in the closet.

A humorous, short clip explaining why socialism is fundamentally flawed as an economic model. 'Reagan vs Obama - Socialism Economics 101'

Socialism video of Obama vs Reagan

It is all too easy to think all is lost when we see the rampant and progressive march and overwhelming evil sponsored by:

• our political leaders, secularists and homosexual (sodomite) lobby groups who publically desire and embrace the trashing and blaspheming of God’s law;
• the cheer-leading of the media to accelerate this godless agenda;
• the lack of clarity of message and the use of secular arguments, leaving out God’s commandments, by religious opposition groups to oppose this change;

and the greatest travesty of all,

• Christians acquiescing sin, with apathy, entertaining and discussing sin in terms of appeasement, equality rights, not wanting to offend the sinner, and welcoming unrepentant and brazen sinners into fellowship and leadership within the Church.

Out of the horse's mouth... David Cameron wants the British people, including your children, to fully embrace and be tolerant of the disgusting, sinful culture and health risks of the GLTBTQ lifestyle.

David Cameron at GLBT reception 25 July 2012, 10 Downing Street:

"The third point I wanted to make is, changing laws is important, legislating is important. But what is equally important – arguably now what is more important – is actually going to be changing culture; whether it's on the football field, or in the rugby dressing room. Changing the culture whether it's in the school playground, changing the culture in the workplace, changing the culture everywhere so that people can genuinely feel we live in an equal, fair and tolerant country. And changing the culture is much more difficult than changing the law, changing culture is much more subtle and difficult. But the promise I can make you is that this coalition government is committed to both changing the law and also working to help change the culture and the Conservative party absolutely backs that. This is something I personally feel very passionately about."

BTM has been saying for decades, that the GLBTQ agenda is all about enforced, through legislation, social engineering and cultural change, fascism. Now is the time to make a stand against the blasphemy of our political leaders and their passion for same sex marriage and the approbation of all things sexually perverse. God commands us to repent of sin, not grant it 'equality' and 'tolerance'.

An MP sent this quote of what David Cameron has said about churches, in reply to a letter from a constituent stating her opposition to same-sex marriage:

"I passionately believe that all institutions need to wake up to the case for equality and the Church shouldn't be locking out people who are gay, or are bisexual or are transgender from being full members of that Church, because many people with deeply held Christian views are also gay. And just as the Conservative Party, as an institution, made a mistake in locking people out, so I think the Churches can be in danger of doing the same thing." (Prime Minister's speach at LGBT Reception, 25 July 2012)

The first thing to note is how gloriously ignorant Cameron is!

He equates 'the Church' with 'churches', and both with 'institutions'.

Then he equates these with a political party!

He dares to tell people of God who they may, and may not, 'lock out', when it is God Himself who 'locks them out' because of their unbelief and heinous acts!

Dear Mr Cameron, Mr Clegg and Mr Miliband

Re: Same Sex Marriage -The consequences of breaking God's Law

I am deeply grieved by the determination of the three main party leaders and your minsters to drive through, despite huge opposition from the general public, legislation to introduce same sex marriage.

God has declared that:

• Marriage is the union and coming together of a man and a woman for the procreation of children from Creation.
• Homosexuality is an abomination and evidence of a giving over to sin in an individual's life and the rejection of God by a nation.

So why are you so determined to spit in God's face and say His laws no longer apply?

It was only a matter of time. A Canadian journal (The Register) has published a list of things homosexuals consider to be 'illegal' and against them, to be crushed immediately. The list includes just about anything and everything!

Even this short piece would come under their hammer. This is exactly what the British Labour Party promise to homosexuals if they get back into power.

So – it WILL come... unless God intervenes and Christians start to wise-up.But, not only Christians... as I have said in the past few years, by all means start with the argument from scripture – but follow it up with the cold, hard facts about homosexuality as a behaviour.

The Church of England (CofE) made a withering attack on government because of its plan to bring in Same-Sex 'marriage' (SSM).

Whether this will have an effect is unsure if not impossible, seeing as government says it WILL bring SSM in, regardless of opposition. That is – less than 1% of the population is dictating to the 99% who do not want gay marriage. In anyone's language, that's dictatorship, totalitarianism, socialism!

The CofE forgets that the power behind the throne is not Cameron, but Stonewall!

The CofE hierarchy sounds hot and fiery, but it is really a damp squib, because it is shouting too late.

Half of its influential members want to embrace gay marriage, whilst the conservative half are opposed.

But, the opposition is not biblical but political.

Anglicans say that gay marriage is the "biggest threat to the Church in its 5oo year history". (1: Independent, 12th June).

They care more for the CofE than for scripture, which is the REAL source of opposition! But, no mention is made of God's laws, nor of morality, nor of biblical truth. This is why its present anger is worthless.

As we have said before, all new evil movements begin by changing words and their meaning. Homosexuals began this shift with the nonsense word, 'Homophobia'.

More recently, they now want to change the meaning of marriage. And they want to give us a new concept – one that is not just stupid, but socially-inept.

Very basically, they want to remove the concept of marriage as involving sexual union. Why? Because, by doing so, they hope to also remove any connection of sex with marriage. (See Coalition for Marriage website).

In other words, they will also want to remove any link to consummation of marriage. Why? Because homosexuals CANNOT consummate a marriage or any other union! One can only consummate a man-woman union.

Here is BTM's response to the Government Office of Equalities consultation exercise on the preposterous proposal of Equal Civil Same Sex Marriage implementation. 

The consultation questions are in the majority directed at GLBTQ people, as can be seen below, and the Impact Analysis is so restricted in scope that it is a sop to show that the the box has been ticked to implement the policy without further ado. What is democracy when the result of a consultation is already determined?

List of consultation questions and answers submitted by BTM follows:

Government Equalities Office

Dear Sir/Madam

Re: Complaint regarding censorship of the Core Issues Trust "Not gay! Post-gay, ex-gay and proud. Get over it!" posters on Transport for London buses.

I would like to make a complaint under the Equality Act 2010, for the open, blatant and politically motivated discrimination by Boris Johnson, Chairman of Transport for London, for censoring the legally approved posters on Transport for London buses sponsored by Core Issues Trust "Not gay! Post-gay, ex-gay and proud. Get over it!" This is a denial of goods and services to an organisation based on the grounds of their "Religion or Belief" (protected characteristic) and is therefore a violation of the Equality Act 2010.

Boris Johnson, the bumbling, yet somehow amiable Mayor of London, will be standing for re-election on May 3rd 2012 alongside his main rival, 'Red Ken' Livingstone (Labour), Brian Paddick (of that all but finished party, the Liberal Democrats), Lawrence Webb ('Fresh Choice for London' / UKIP),  Jenny Jones (Green), Carlos Cortigula (BNP), and Siobhan Benita (Independent). Given recent events (which I'll discuss below), I would argue that Conservative Christians should think very carefully before re-electing this man - indeed, I would call on all Christians to abandon him completely.

Having called him 'amiable', why am I suggesting that Christians should not 'Back Boris' (as the campaign slogan goes), and why do I assert that there is really very little to choose between him, and having the Marxist (yet very rich, and tax-fiddling: Ironic, I know) 'Red Ken' occupying City Hall? Well, perhaps firstly I should explain why I think so many find Boris likeable.  Put simply, he is not your standard politician! He is generally accepted as being rather non-politically correct, and he is often seen as a bit of a rebel, not being afraid to speak up on certain issues, much to the annoyance of David Cameron, who it seems sometimes has trouble restraining him.

Yet, Boris has done something this week that shows himself to be nothing more than an authoritarian. While I allow you to catch your breath at the use of that label, let me explain :  Authoritarianism is when those in power have ultimate authority on what is allowed to be said, done, and ultimately, thought. And now allow me to explain why I make this association with Boris Johnson: