Tuesday, Jan 23rd

Last update:02:48:41 PM GMT

You are here: In the News

In the News

Sin has degraded everything around us

E-mail Print PDF

Why do we need police?

Sin.
Why do we need armies?

Sin.
Why do we need doctors and nurses?

Sin.

Why do we need mental health services?

Sin.

Why do we need security guards?

Sin.

Why does everything cost so much?

Sin.

Why does homosexuality exist?

Sin.

Why do people curse in the streets?

Sin.

Why are pubs and clubs centres for evil?

Sin.

Why, then, are we so surprised by televised wickedness, Islamic murders, and governments siding with evil?

Sin has degraded everything around us, and everything within us. And this will get worse until the last day.

Only sinners saved by grace will survive into the next life.

The majority will enter a place of torment forever.

This is why Christians must witness, not just in words, but in actions that praise God. Do you?

Ross Kemp: Extreme World: Sky 2: 18th December 2017

E-mail Print PDF

Racism in the USA rooted in Barack Obama

His programme looked at the rising racism in the USA.

But, a number of problems arose, in my view.

He appeared to begin his quest with Donald Trump’s presidency.

But, he didn’t question the part in this of Barack Obama.

Indeed, one statement he made showed a pro-Obama stance. 

True, some of the things said by the various black and white racist groups were alarming, and some were disgusting.

For someone like myself, who has followed the situation closely since before Obama illicitly took power, the programme was unbalanced and too brief to deal with the facts. 

I have no doubt both black and white groups have grievances, but, no-one has highlighted the way Obama drove a huge wedge between black and white citizens, and how he showed nothing but contempt for the police in the USA.

As a Marxist it was his aim to divide society deeply, so they rose up in anger. He has managed to do that, and Ross Kemp began at Trump instead of with Obama and socialism.

What we now see – and it was said on the programme by the various groups – is the expression of views suppressed and yet encouraged by Obama and socialism. They said that with Trump telling truth and being open, they could now do the same.

In other words, they were prevented from doing so under Obama, and the new environment has meant they can at last be open!!

What we are seeing is a natural outcome of being suppressed.

Bury people and their views and they’ll become resentful and angry. Push farther, and they’ll jump out of their corner fighting.

This has occurred throughout history! It was not caused by Trump and he is not a white supremacist, nor does he condone its ethos. All he did was remove the communistic prison door used by Obama to lock out sense, discussion and open views.

He did it simply by being open and rejecting the PC attitudes of a Marxist government. The various movements have suddenly found their voices, whether or not what they say and do is right.

People like George Soros are paying individuals to rise up in anger and to further divide society. It is why Obama did the same thing. It is typical Marxist/fascist/socialist strategy – get the people to be at each other’s throats. Wait for it to reach its height so most of society is afraid and angry. THEN come in with draconian force to bring ‘peace’. Or, in other words, socialist totalitarianism.

Kemp, then, is missing the whole picture. He sees racism, when, all along, it is about socialist meddling, destroying the fabric of society.

It has gone on for decades with politicians being paid goons of Soros, etc., just as Obama was. Obama has now done his job and become very rich. He is still peddling his socialist wares and stirring the racist pot. But, no-one points the finger at him. This is because people get used to being pushed around, to having socialist dreams foisted on them, covering up the real aims of the elite few who really run countries. If nothing else, the election of Trump and the fight against Brexit have brought to light the stinking underbelly of the beast before the world. The two issues have pulled back the curtains to reveal the actual state of the West.

Instead of voting for politicians who are true, honest and ready to serve those who vote for them, voters have elected men and women they KNOW to be corrupt, self-centred and self-serving. This has been done on the back of rampant godlessness, and so godlessness has become our flag AND life. Christians have been at the forefront of this movement, by not condemning evil, by electing corrupt men to office, and by watering down their own faith and keeping sinful men in their pulpits.

What we now see happening in Europe and the USA is but the opening of the dam of unrighteousness, a dam filled with the needs and wants of evil men and women, undealt with by those in power, because they themselves are equally unjust and evil. This could have been averted by true men of power authorised by God to rule. But, the three presidents up to and including Obama kept filling the dam with the filth of nations. In Europe, no-one stopped the fascist EU from its race to control the northern hemisphere. And no-one kicked out the UN. And that is why Brexit may be crushed – by people who want to return to their own vomit rather than begin a fresh life outside of the shackles of corrupt people and systems.

Meanwhile God is providing a penalty, including green anti-science costing us billions, the foul diseases given to us by homosexuals, and the violence of Islam. There is much more to come, but people have fallen in love with their vomit and greedily lap it up.

So, when watching programmes such as Ross Kemp’s, use your discretion and probe the background. He gets only so far, giving good facts... but fails because he doesn’t ‘join the dots’... something EVERY Christian, academic or not, should do every day. It has nothing to do with having an high intellect – it is to do with being aware and honest, seeking facts not fiction. Few attain to this, mainly because they can’t be bothered and don’t want the responsibility of knowing the truth, whether it is political, social or spiritual.

Well, the truth they hide from is soon going to batter-down their front doors!

Mosques/teaching venues Teach Extremism – some examples as proof

E-mail Print PDF

Police and government are on a wide-scale campaign to make us love our local mosque. The reason is cowardly – to help prevent further attacks by Islamists. Islam presents a confusing face to the West and try to claim that terrorists are ‘not Islamic’, even though they clearly ARE and say so! I find the government agenda dangerous and uncritical, having no real understanding of what Islam is all about. Mosques and other establishments around the world are teaching gross violence. Therefore, it is rather foolish for the UK government to assume mosques in the UK are all pure and loving. The first link below shows how ‘loving’ those teaching children are! From my many sources this behaviour exactly reflects the majority view of Muslims towards children. Not all in the business of teaching Islam are violent – but enough of them exist to be wary of.

(Note that of almost 1700 mosques in the UK, only two have amended their beliefs to suit the modern world)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8321005/Mosques-teaching-extreme-views-to-children.html 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/06/who-runs-our-mosques/

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/london-bridge-terrorist-attackers-british-muslim-man-islam-saudi-mosques-wahhabi-different-a7775116.html

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/31/sensitive-uk-terror-funding-inquiry-findings-may-never-be-published-saudi-arabia

Dispatches - Undercover Mosque from Ole Olsen on Vimeo.

Undercover Mosque is a documentary programme produced by the independent television company Hardcash Productions[1] for the Channel 4 series Dispatches that was first broadcast on 15 January 2007 in the UK. The documentary presents video footage gathered from 12 months of secret investigation into mosques throughout Britain. The documentary caused a furore in Britain and the world press due to the extremist content of the released footage. West Midlands Police investigated whether criminal offences had been committed by those teaching or preaching at the Mosques and other establishments. Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undercover_Mosque

Of course, the ever-PC police force try to blacken the names of any who bring attention to imams and mosques guilty of hatred.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/adam-deen/saudi-funded-mosques_b_16825640.html

Read article in The Mirror, Dr Simon Ross, 5th June, 2017, on the horrendous teachings in the majority of mosques (run by the Wahhabi sect) in the UK, funded by the Saudis. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-wahhabism-puritanical-code-islam-10564342

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3174763/saudi-arabias-web-of-hate-is-spreading-one-of-the-worst-forms-of-islam-and-this-is-where-it-leads/

Many police chiefs, however, try to teach their officers that mosques are not involved in teaching violence. To teach this to police, they must use single claims BY Muslims and ignore all the other reports! Note how this imam says UK mosques are “coming forward”... which contradicts the fact hat only TWO out of 1700 are doing so!! http://metro.co.uk/2017/06/07/imam-claims-theres-no-evidence-of-extremism-in-uk-mosques-6690712/

http://news.sky.com/story/exposed-uk-school-promoting-extreme-islam-10224616

http://www.iaindale.com/posts/2015/06/28/why-wahhabi-salafist-mosques-should-be-banned-from-receiving-foreign-funding

Note how the men were marginalised by the mosque but not handed over to police...

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-02-07/mosque-attended-by-british-terror-cell-condemns-extremism/

https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/dispatches-undercover-mosque/

This mosque may or may not have known they were terrorists, but how many are invited to speak??

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/5034464.Blackburn_terror_suspect_was_to_teach_in_mosque/

Then we have a mosque that WAS terroristic. Thus to say mosques have no part in teaching terror is ludicrous and untrue!  http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/mosque-wars-how-radical-jihadis-were-driven-out-out-britains-terrorist-mosque-1503294

We discovered that a site containing a vital report on madrassas that teach terror is now missing! What a surprise! https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/inside-madrassas-understanding-and-engaging-with-british-muslim-faith-supplementary-schools

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0Mx5DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA491&lpg=PA491&dq=uk+mosques+that+teach+terror&source=bl&ots=L4ZaKKzQ-Q&sig=tYDvIaAdhS-nDi8_KCasC9x63d8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwit-LvF1_7VAhWlA8AKHSigBHU4HhDoAQgzMAE#v=onepage&q=uk%20mosques%20that%20teach%20terror&f=false

It is known that the biggest danger an undercover police agent has, is that he or she will adopt the views and actions of those they have infiltrated. This is a form of Stockholm Syndrome. This link is for interest... https://www.thenational.ae/world/europe/relations-are-rock-bottom-with-undercover-police-in-uk-mosques-1.423052

The following quote is from a government paper/report... and how do we trust a government that allows and fosters Islam to do whatever it wishes? And how can we trust it when what it says is counter to investigative work by others? I am naturally very analytical and this Report does not wash with me. (The Report: Roots of violent radicalisation; Nineteenth Report of Session 2010-12. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee.

“32. Charles Farr told us that violent radicalisation in mosques or other religious institutions comprises “no more than 1% or 2%” of the total cases of radicalisation. Our witnesses tended to agree that there was very little threat from the mosques. Alyas Karmani, for example, argued that “mosques are completely disconnected from young at risk Muslims”. The Prevent Strategy states that community resistance has reduced the open operation of radical preachers and driven many to operate out of private homes or the internet. Consequently, while the Strategy cautions ongoing vigilance against potential threats, its focus on mosques is more as a tool to help in countering extremist ideology by presenting competing points of view”

Sadly, few police chiefs and others understand how to research properly or how to be critical of certain findings. They accept these Reports as if proven and beyond criticism. This is a dangerous practice. At the latter end of the report there was further lack of criticism of statements made; they were simply accepted to be true! This is the very opposite of true police work.

 Also, very few academics have studied counter-terrorism (Leiden University report: Countering Radicalisation by engaging mosques and imams: The UK’s Case’. See https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/38036/Zahra%20Shah%20-%20Thesis.pdf?sequence=1 , which means that those who do, become the ‘experts’ used by police and government. Again, not a suitable way to examine the facts. More needs to be used – and especially those whose views are NOT government/police inspired. We only have the word of pro-Islamists who say ‘mosques are not involved’. This is NOT what a more rounded set of sources proclaim! The Report, p7, includes: “London mosques have been under increasing scrutiny since key cases such as the issue of Abu Hamza, who served as the imam of Finsbury Park Mosque, recruited for terrorism, and incited racial hatred. Suspected Al Qai’da member Kamel Bourgass and Zacarias Moussaoui who was allegedly involved in the 9/11 plot, were also known to have visited there (Dean and Allen 2006). Further to this, mosque preachers have also been made accountable for indirectly facilitating radicalisation. A reason for this is that most imams have come to the UK from abroad and do not understand Western culture; nor can they speak English. This creates inaccessibility between them and youth, pushing youth to seek answers elsewhere. Some imams have also been directly responsible for spreading radical Islamic interpretations (Bureš 2011). Many radical preachers have been prosecuted, arrested, deported, or refused entry to the UK (Home Office 2011).

The point is this – we cannot rely on the veracity of imams who claim they are not terroristic, any more than we can rely on Ian Brady to say he was not a murderer. We may only conclude that possibly some might not be terroristic and some are. To firmly say that what the imams say should be accepted as truth is a danger, and is certainly not evidence of a critical analysis. It should be remembered that just one terrorist can potentially kill hundreds, and because they ALL arise from the same ‘melting pot’ of Islam, we should be wary of all Muslims. Police do this all the time – if a youngster’s family is always in trouble with police, they naturally observe that youngster for the same traits. If they do not observe they are fools, even if nothing has yet been proved against the youngster.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/08/uk-primary-school-teacher-urged-muslims-to-wage-jihad-and-establish-caliphate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamism_in_the_United_Kingdom

 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/05/isis-recruitment-moves-to-radical-network-and-mosques

 We could give many more sources that show the part taken by mosques in Britain and around the world in terror and terroristic teaching. We only have the word of mosques, who say they are not terroristic. And undercover agents who say the same may, or may not, be speaking truth (re Stockholm Syndrome). Also, times before and after their infiltration may, or may not, have been terroristic. The major fact is that worldwide Islam is pro-terror and pro-violence... why should UK Islam be different? In other words, we may never know the true extent of mosque-led/supportive terror links. Islam is about conquest and violence. To ignore this is to conduct weak and uncritical studies.

© August 2017

Published on www.christiandoctrine.com

Bible Theology Ministries - PO Box 415, Swansea, SA5 8YH
Wales
United Kingdom

Please 'Make a Donation' to support the work of Bible Theology Ministries

Jerusalem Recognised as the Capital of Israel

E-mail Print PDF

Violence has erupted throughout the Middle East because  Donald Trump recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Some have criticised him for doing so, saying that it will unleash more violence.

But, wait a moment – that area is ALREADY committed to mindless violence anyway!!

And violence coming from ‘Palestine’ is ongoing – violence being its daily wickedness!

In other words – so what?

Yes, Muslims will step up their harassment of the West, but it is about time the West stood up to the continual Islamic bullying of non-Muslims.

We must also ask a question – what has Trump’s declaration got to do with those who do not live in Jerusalem???

Nothing!! The reactions in other places are evidence of hatred for the West and Jews. The fake hold on Temple Mount is manufactured, a claim made outside of historical facts. The Muslims still have control of the Mount, so what is the big deal? The deal is that Islam wants ALL of Jerusalem. Simple as that. But not content with political negotiations, Muslims prefer to use violence, as they do everywhere in the world where they can’t get their own way. The violence was coming; anyone with sense knows it. So, Trump has not really caused it.

Islamic countries should just shut up – they already have their Mecca. But, typically of Islam, they also want control of anywhere else they stake a fake claim... including buildings and burial grounds legally owned by Jews.

Much of ‘Palestine’ was bought and covered by contracts by Israelis Jerusalem belongs to the family of David... and today there are a defined group of David’s family alive today. Therefore, THEY own Temple Mount, not the fickle and violent Muslims. Forget the ‘poor Palestinians’ who want death and evil, for they bring their own downfall upon themselves. Israel has always offered them free health care and jobs!

 

The Lord's Prayer does not need amending

E-mail Print PDF

"Pope Francis has called for the English wording of the Lord’s Prayer to be changed, because it implies God “induces temptation”.

The prayer asks God to “lead us not into temptation”.

But the pontiff told Italian broadcasters he believed the wording should be altered to better reflect that it was not God who led humans to sin.

He told the TV2000 channel: “It is not a good translation because it speaks of a God who induces temptation.”

He added: “I am the one who falls; it’s not him pushing me into temptation to then see how I have fallen.

“A father doesn’t do that, a father helps you to get up immediately. It’s Satan who leads us into temptation, that’s his department.” (The Guardian, 8 December 2017)

Commentary

  1. It is true that God does not tempt us. That is, drive us into sin.
  2. It is true that temptation can either be a trial of our faith or an attempt to lead us into sin.
  3. God is not the cause of our sin.
  4. ‘Temptation’ is the masculine noun, peirasmos.
  5. Therefore, any notion that God leads (eispherō)us to sin is invalid.

Rather, the phrase should be viewed as asking God to keep us from giving in to temptation e.g. ‘Do not bring us to temptation’. It HAS to mean this otherwise we accuse God of causing us to sin, which is impossible.

As we find in Matthew 26:41, Christians are spiritually wishing to be pure, but fail and are drawn into temptation, when they do not pray for God’s protection and do not watch out for the incursion of sin in the first place. This is why Jesus told us to be careful to pray that we “enter not into temptation”. (Luke 22:40)

The phrase, then, is an Hebraic opposite, saying that God can deliver us from evil IF we watch and pray that we remain pure.

The phrase “And lead us not” does not, then, mean God causes us to enter into temptation (after failing to watch and pray), but it means the exact opposite... that is, He does not lead us into temptation. The words of Jesus tell us this is so... it is our own fault when we walk into a tempting situation, because the very act of doing so means we are considering falling for it into sin.

The phrase is simply a statement of God’s intention to keep us safe, not an accusation against God.

 

 

 1. It is true that God does not tempt us. That is, drive us into sin.

2. It is true that temptation can either be a trial of our faith or an attempt to lead us into sin.

3. God is not the cause of our sin.

4. ‘Temptation’ is the masculine noun, peirasmos.

5. Therefore, any notion that God leads (eispherō)us to sin is invalid.

Rather, the phrase should be viewed as asking God to keep us from giving in to temptation.

e.g. ‘Do not bring us to temptation’. It HAS to mean this otherwise we accuse God of

causing us to sin, which is impossible. As we find in Matthew 26:41, Christians are spiritually

wishing to be pure, but fail and are drawn into temptation, when they do not pray for God’s

protection and do not watch out for the incursion of sin in the first place. This is why Jesus told

us to be careful to pray that we “enter not into temptation”. (Luke 22:40).

The phrase, then, is an Hebraic opposite, saying that God can deliver us from evil IF we watch

and pray that we remain pure. The phrase “And lead us not” does not, then, mean God causes

us to enter into temptation (after failing to watch and pray), but it means the exact opposite...

that is, He does not lead us into temptation. The words of Jesus tell us this is so... it is our own

fault when we walk into a tempting situation, because the very act pf doing so means we are

considering falling for it into sin.

The phrase is simply a statement of God’s intention to keep us safe, not an accusation against God.

Page 1 of 66

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »