Saturday, Dec 15th

Last update:07:44:04 PM GMT

You are here: Politics List View A Royal Wedding with a Political Agenda

A Royal Wedding with a Political Agenda

E-mail Print PDF

It appears that the 'wedding' of Prince Harry and Megan Markle, Saturday March 19th, bewitched probably more Christians than non-believers.

The wedding represented the pinnacle of the cultural Marxist’s goals, the vanquishing of the institutions upon which western civilisation is founded. Having marched through the corridors, halls and courts of the arts, media, education, museums and the legal profession, including the Church, they have finally touched the apple of the eye of British nation, the royal family who themselves, maybe, were too undiscerning to realise that on that wedding day, the militant, supremacist, black feminists and homosexuals had finally vanquished “ white, heteronormative patriarchy”, signalling the last macabre, glittering theatrical display of royal privilege, before it sinks into oblivion.

It appears that the invitation to the primate of the Episcopalian Church of the United States of America (ECUSA), Michael Curray , the black, all - singing and dancing promoter of all things bright and peculiar, with his incantation of “Luuurrve, luuurve, luuurve” which echoed 58 times in St George’s chapel, plus the inclusion of the ear-ringed, female, black priest, Rose Hudson Wilkins, previous chaplain to the Queen, was initiated by both Meghan and Justine Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury.
As one commentator said, “It appears the Justine Welby’s decision to invite Michael Curry to give the address at the Wedding was politically motivated. ECUSA have been rejected by the Anglican Church World Wide, especially from those living in the Southern Hemisphere, over the issue of gay marriage in the Church. Justine Welby is extremely sympathetic to the same sex marriage and describes some queer relationships whom he knows as being absolutely stunning. What better way to take a swipe at those Anglicans who refuse to compromise, than to use Michael Curry as a tool of propaganda. This is cultural Marxism”.

The commentator continues, “I became suspicious of the choice of Presiding Bishop, Michael Curry to be the preacher at the wedding when I read that it was Archbishops Welby’s idea. Surely not, thought I. He wouldn’t dare, not after the partial suspension imposed on TEC by the Anglican Communion a few year ago. A bold move by Welby, not usually known for boldness, but I was unaware of his cunning side. He used Curry as a mule to carry his own pernicious liberal proclivities that he would not have expressed so eloquently himself “.

As the historian Toynbee stated, the apocalyptic vision of a violent [Marxist] revolution is to invert the present roles of Proletariat and Dominant Majority ... “in a reversal of roles which is to carry the Chosen People ... from the lowest to the highest place in the Kingdom of this World.”

In other words, the Christian culture is to be turned upside-down and the chosen ones — those, along with their subculture, the gays, lesbians, abortionists and paedophiles who rage and shake their fist against God are placed into positions of dominance. “The new Kingdom is to be matrist and polymorphously perverse”.
Traditionally, at a wedding, the clergyman addressing the couple and members of the congregation, apart from focussing on the Triune God, the Author and Sustainer of marriage, focuses on the couple. After all, this is their day, the one for which they have long planned; but on this occasion, Michael Curray, shaman and witch doctor became the centre piece of the event which he used to advance his narcissistic and demonic ideology.

But both Harry and Megan are themselves long practised in fornication and the world of adultery. Both Princes, Harry and William, besides being dominated by women, are now captive patrons of the Attitude Magazine within the covers of which are displayed phalluses and the naked bodies to which they are attached.
Both Meghan and Harry have been appointed the Commonwealth Youth Ambassadors, in which capacity they will further LGBT world domination and overturn the family and church structures of those countries. Why should we not see Royals this year in London Gay Pride Parade?

The “luurve” peddled by Michael Curray is not peaceful, tolerant, inclusive, non- judgemental and kaleidoscopic in its diversity. It is violent and rejects all those who refuse to embrace LGBT clergy and LGBT ‘marriages’. It hounds any dissidents out of their churches and pursues them with crippling litigation through the courts. This marriage, signals the persecution of real Christians within the Anglican Church world- wide.

Meanwhile, within the same week, we have a massacre of the innocents , with another batch of 4000, babies being disembowelled, torn and quartered in their mother’s wombs on an endless conveyer belt of death- with more adding to that number from Southern Ireland; and the likes of Tommy Robinson a champion of exposing those things done in the dark, being sent to the Gulaag. This is Britain. Civil war was openly declared a long time ago on the British people but without a single shot being fired in our defence. Unless we regain our Christian moral fibre and martial vigour, we are finished.